"Predatory Publisher"について、ジャーナルから直接回答を得る。

先日の”Predatory Publisher”の記事の続編です。　10月14日の記事。　直接ジャーナルに、こんなリストに
あなた方の出版社について書かれているけど、どう思う？という感じで聞きました。以下の「」がその回答です。
XXXXXは出版名を消してます。

About Predatory Publisher: We have answered these questions multiple times. 
We　Comments (1) Why are you not defending yourself? I have seen your articles and the evaluation process. Its high quality.
First, we suspect some blogs were written by freelancers possibly hired by some big players in the Open Access publishing industry. Explanation will only cause confusion.
Second, we’d rather focus our precious time, energy and resources on serving our lovely readers, authors and volunteer board members.

Comments (2)They say these journals are predatory and want to make money.
Ironically, some major Open Access publishers that charge one to three thousand dollars per accepted article are not on the predatory list. Some even claim themselves as non-profit.
Unlike other Open Access journals, all XXXXX journals do not charge article processing fee for standard submissions that need a 12-week peer review service. Optional article processing charge will apply ONLY if a shorter review period (4-week) is needed and requested specifically by the author(s).

At every moment, we firmly believe that our editorial team members have been doing the right thing, according to the highest standards, not only in terms of academic standards, but also in the ethics standards. We are very proud of what we do here at XXXXX.

要するには、自分の信じた道を信じるしかないように思いました。これだけ誇りをもって働いている人たちを
疑うのもなぁと思うわけです。　最終的には、自分自身をどのレベルで認めてあげるかとかとも関係しそうです。
この論文は初めてある海外企業とコレボレーションして完成した論文だったので、なるべくいいところにとも
考えるが、スピードも大事。結局はここの出版社のところで採択されてホッとしている自分がいるので、これでよかったかと思っています。